Now, ask yourself why is Obama meeting with the very people who are responsible for the Official United States Policy of Depopulation of the Continent of Africa?
Why is BHO not having his Attorney General, Eric Holder, a Black man,
prosecute these people for CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY?
"Obama, who outlined his vision of a world free of atomic weapons in a speech in Prague last month, said he welcomed the support of the bipartisan group, who have been pushing for over two years for the United States to lead an effort to eliminate nuclear arms."
Some Media Hype - bipartisan with Henry killer Kissenger and Nazi , George Shultz? What about a "drone free" world, a taser free world, a Patriot Act free world, police state free world, a Fema camp free world, A world free of Bailouts to Casino banksters, who place bets on Hedge Funds, "derivatives?Obama meeting with Henry Kissenger and George Shultz to known Nazi's who are responsible for the Offical depopulation program against the Continent of Africa
National Security Memo 200. NSSM 200. IMPLICATIONS OF WORLDWIDE POPULATION GROWTH. FOR U.S. SECURITY AND OVERSEAS INTERESTS. Contents. KISSINGER LETTER. NSSM 200 ...
National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) - April 1974
a comprehensive guide to overpopulation, population control, Political Conflict, ... CHAPTER V - IMPLICATIONS OF POPULATION PRESSURES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY ...
Globalists Henry Kissinger & Richard Haass Confronted on ...
... Colorado confront globalists Henry Kissinger and CFR president Richard Haass ... before dismissing any knowledge of National Security Memo #200, which calls for ...
... National Security Council completed 'National Security Study Memo 200: Implications ... for Brent Scowcroft who replaced Kissinger as national security ... www.covenantnews.com/samples071220.htm
Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for
Food Control Genocide
This article appeared as part of a feature in the December 8, 1995 issue of Executive Intelligence Review, and was circuclated extensively by the Schiller Insitute Food for Peace Movement. It is reprinted here as part of the package: “Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage?”
Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide
by Joseph Brewda
Dec. 8, 1995
On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.
The bogus arguments that Kissinger advanced were not original. One of his major sources was the Royal Commission on Population, which King George VI had created in 1944 “to consider what measures should be taken in the national interest to influence the future trend of population.” The commission found that Britain was gravely threatened by population growth in its colonies, since “a populous country has decided advantages over a sparsely-populated one for industrial production.” The combined effects of increasing population and industrialization in its colonies, it warned, “might be decisive in its effects on the prestige and influence of the West,” especially effecting “military strength and security.”
NSSM 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in the former colonial sector. It paid special attention to 13 “key countries” in which the United States had a “special political and strategic interest”: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome, since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength.
For example, Nigeria: “Already the most populous country on the continent, with an estimated 55 million people in 1970, Nigeria's population by the end of this century is projected to number 135 million. This suggests a growing political and strategic role for Nigeria, at least in Africa.” Or Brazil: “Brazil clearly dominated the continent demographically.” The study warned of a “growing power status for Brazil in Latin America and on the world scene over the next 25 years.”
Food as a weapon
There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that “population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline,” even if such measures were adopted.
A second measure was curtailing food supplies to targetted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: “There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID [U.S. Agency for International Development] and consultative groups. Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.”
“Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now,” the document continued, adding, “Would food be considered an instrument of national power? ... Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won't control their population growth?”
Kissinger also predicted a return of famines that could make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary. “Rapid population growth and lagging food production in developing countries, together with the sharp deterioration in the global food situation in 1972 and 1973, have raised serious concerns about the ability of the world to feed itself adequately over the next quarter of century and beyond,” he reported.
The cause of that coming food deficit was not natural, however, but was a result of western financial policy: “Capital investments for irrigation and infrastucture and the organization requirements for continuous improvements in agricultural yields may be beyond the financial and administrative capacity of many LDCs. For some of the areas under heaviest population pressure, there is little or no prospect for foreign exchange earnings to cover constantly increasingly imports of food.”
“It is questionable,” Kissinger gloated, “whether aid donor countries will be prepared to provide the sort of massive food aid called for by the import projections on a long-term continuing basis.” Consequently, “large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades—a kind the world thought had been permanently banished,” was foreseeable—famine, which has indeed come to pass.
To read the full report from EIR Magazine,
Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage?
Food For Peace Page
Hoof and Mouth Disease in Europe
Join the Schiller Institute!
The Schiller Institute
Glen Ford bailout 50 Tillion dollars, World Economy Capital University Free Press
LaRouche Webcast: Greatest Crisis in Modern History: The Last ...
This webcast transcript appears in the November 28, 2008 issue of ... LAROUCHE WEBCAST: GREATEST CRISIS IN MODERN HISTORY. The Last Chance For Civilization? ...
”When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the
government fears the people, there is liberty.” – Thomas Jefferson
The Character of the Man
Two pictures worth a thousand words Each
“Obama's revealing body language “ by Thomas Lifson shows the difference between the character of President Obama who walks arrogantly ahead, heedless of his friend’s infirmities, and Sergeant Crowley who helps the handicapped Professor Gates, Obama’s fellow victim of self-defined “racial profiling.”
“Is Obama a racist?” by Frances Rice makes the case that President Obama harbors feelings of antagonism and superiority toward white people.
Video: Cambridge Police Officer Kelly King says that she supported and voted for Obama, but will not vote for him again
“Black cop at Gates home regrets 'Uncle Tom' label” reveals how Cambridge Sgt. Leon Lashley who was at the scene of the arrest of Prof. Gates was maligned as an "Uncle Tom" for supporting Sgt. James Crowley.
Sgt. Lashley's Letter To Prof. Gates: I Am Not An Uncle Tom
"The End Of White Guilt?" by Nancy Morgan presents the premise that the race-baiting by President Obama results in our nation finally realizing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream where Americans may now be free to judge a man based on the content of his character instead of the color of his skin.
??? "What about the end of Oppression of Black people?