Chicago-Midwest

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

First African-American and Democrat juvenile court judge can’t get a fair Trial in Cincinnati

 

Cincinnati, OH- September 9, 2014—After day one of Judge Tracie Hunter’s trial, supporters are questioning whether she can have a fair trial in Hamilton County, and what it means to have a jury of ones peers?  While there are differing opinions on what constitutes a fair trial, one thing that is for certain is that the U.S. Supreme Court has held that courts may not remove a potential juror based solely on his or her race, religion, or gender.

 

According to Hunter’s supporters, the potential juror pool in this case appears to have been anything but random, composing of a female employee of WCPO TV, which sued Hunter last year; an attorney from Frost, Brown & Todd, the law firm which represented WCPO in that suit; several jurors who said that they personally know juvenile court administrator Curt Kissinger, a possible witness, who has made public statements against Hunter.  Another potential witness said he knows Judge John Williams, the other juvenile court judge.  The potential juror said their children attend the same school.

 

Williams lost the 2010 election to Hunter.  Kissinger and Williams have been opposing forces throughout Hunter's time on the juvenile court.  Both are listed as potential witnesses and could potentially testify in Hunters trial.

 

One of the alternate jurors says that her relative is a Hamilton County Drug Enforcement Agent. She is also a member of the Ski Club and the Women's Republican club.  Party politics are also expected to play a major role in this case.

 

Another potential juror is an employee of Hamilton County Treasurers Office, which could potentially be questioned concerning credit card transactions, as Hunter has been charged with a felony for using her court issued card to cover costs of court filing fees, after attorneys James Bogen and Firooz Namei, who were paid $50,000 by Hamilton County to represent Hunter failed to file answers to the nearly 30 lawsuits filed against her.  WCPO TV, the Cincinnati Enquirer, Hamilton County Public Defenders Office, Hamilton County Prosecutors Office, and the Hamilton County Commissioners Office all filed suits.

 

With help from Judge Norbert Nadel, who dismissed several black jurors for cause, the prosecutor had an added advantage in the jury selection, as he was able to retain his peremptory challenges to attain a jury favorable to the prosecution. Four black potential jurors were dismissed consecutively.  The special prosecutor used a peremptory challenge to dismiss two additional potential black jurors.  One was college educated and said that she felt she could be fair and impartial.

 

Four of the initial 12 jurors said that they did not believe that they could be fair and impartial and admitted they had already formed an opinion, after all of the negative publicity they’ve seen on television.  Judge Nadel did not dismiss them for cause.

 

One black juror was dismissed for cause, when he said that he believed he could not judge another human being.  A for cause dismissal can be made by the judge in the event he believes a person cannot be fair and unbiased or is incapable of serving as a juror.  Causes can include acquaintanceship with either of the parties, one of the attorneys or a witness, or the potential juror's expression of inability to be unbiased due to prior experience in a similar case.

 

Presiding Judge Norbert Nadel dismissed a potential juror before the hearing started on Monday morning.  According to defense attorney, Clyde Bennett II, “she appeared to be black, from the answers to her questionnaire”.  Bennett complained after Nadel dismissed the potential juror before the hearing began, “Judge, I should have had the opportunity to question that juror”. 

 

Prosecutor Joseph Deters released a press release, just three days before the trial began, accusing Judge Hunter of being responsible for the deaths of two black boys, who killed each other in mid-August. One of the boys appeared before Judge Hunter last year in September for minor charges. The most he could have served was 6 months for those infractions. Deters suggested that the boy should have been locked up until he was 21.  News reports stated that the youth had come before several judges in the past for a total of 36 charges prior to getting to Hunters docket, however Deters blamed Hunter for the tragic incident.  The other judges who handled the first 36 charges were not named. The child’s mother said she does not blame Hunter for her son’s death and feels that Hunter ruled justly in her sons case.

 

Attorney Bennett believes that Deters statements were “a deliberate attempt to taint the potential jury”.  He re-introduced his motion to have court proceedings moved from Hamilton County for prosecutor vindictiveness.

 

 

Carol Freas, a white Hunter supporter feels this jury selection process is a violation of Hunters sixth amendment right to a fair trial. “The jury should represent the community in terms of race, gender, and national origin. With a jury that is 90% white, while in contrast 90% of youth in Hamilton County detention centers are African-American, how can Judge Hunter possibly get a fair trial? This jury pool certainly doesn’t represent the racial composition in Hamilton County, or a jury of Judge Hunter’s peers”. 

 

Freas also noted her concern that the although defense attorney for Judge Hunter requested discovery documents from the State of Ohio and the juvenile court in April, 800 pages of discovery documents were not released to the defense until September 4, only two business days before beginning the trial”.  Judge Nadel denied Bennett’s motion to suppress the 800 pages, despite Bennett’s contention that he would not have the opportunity to properly prepare for Hunters defense given the late nature of this submission of evidence.

 

Although there is no clear definition of what a jury of ones peers means, this jury is clearly racially imbalanced with 10 white jurors and 2 blacks.  Hunters fate will rest in the hands of a majority white jury in a case where special prosecutors, Merlyn Shiverdecker and Scott Crosswell III, admit will most certainly carry religious and racial undertones, in an already historically racially charged city.  Police killings of 15 unarmed black men led to a subsequent boycott and several uprisings in Cincinnati, culminating with a police/community collaborative agreement.

 

Many Hunter supporters complained that they were not allowed in the courtroom on the first two days of jury selection. Nearly 6 seats in the courtroom have remained empty the entirety of the first two days of jury selection and throughout the pre-trial hearings. 

 

During Tuesday's court hearing, a potential juror who is an employee of the Hamilton County Treasurers Office accused a black juror of hugging Judge Hunter after Monday’s hearing. There is no word on why Judge Nadel did not view courtroom tapes to confirm these accusations, considering Hunter’s nearly 25 years on the bench and her clear understanding of jury selection and potential juror interaction.

 

Another potential juror said he was a distant cousin of Judge Hunter.  He was excused along with the remaining potential slate.  Judge Hunter said she doesn’t know the potential juror, nor has she ever seen him before.  The questions lingering in the minds of some supporters are, “what is the selection process, and how did so many people with conflicts of interest and connections to Hamilton County come to be selected?”

###

 

Vanessa Enoch, Reporting from Cincinnati

For more information contact:

You Got the Power

P.O. Box 146

Tuskegee, Alabama 36087

(334) 328-6627 

marksallen2800@aol.com
Chairman & COO National Black Wall Street Chicago
(Rev. Willie T. Barrow Consumer Education and Consumer Action Project)
Founder/Lead Organizer, Illinois Voter Restoration Civic Education Project
Chief of Staff to National Chairman, National Black Wall Street USA
"And The Ordinary People Said" News Blog, www.chicagonow.com
Chairman, Community Reinvestment Organizing Project
Listed in 2012 Edition Who' Who In Black Chicago
4655 South King Drive, Suite 203
Chicago, Illinois 60653
(Office) 773-268-6900 or direct 773-392-0165
The Rev. Al Sharpton calls Mark Allen "one of Chicago's legendary political activists and one of the best organizers of his generation"

FOR_IMMEDIATE_RELEASE-Hunter_Trial-vle.doc

Case_Study_7-17a.doc

You need to be a member of TheBlackList Pub to add comments!

Join TheBlackList Pub

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –
https://theblacklist.net/